<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Software on Windows?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foogazi.com/2006/11/02/linux-software-on-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foogazi.com/2006/11/02/linux-software-on-windows/</link>
	<description>Linux Tips, Tricks, and Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smr</title>
		<link>http://www.foogazi.com/2006/11/02/linux-software-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>smr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inguin.com/wordpress/?p=33#comment-120</guid>
		<description>This is a very poorly written article. A lot of Linux software already runs on Windows, since most Linux devs have the sense to let users run their apps on the OS of their choice. Their source code wouldn&#039;t need to be released to be used on Linux, and opening it up won&#039;t make it any less secure, in fact, it would probably make it more secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very poorly written article. A lot of Linux software already runs on Windows, since most Linux devs have the sense to let users run their apps on the OS of their choice. Their source code wouldn&#8217;t need to be released to be used on Linux, and opening it up won&#8217;t make it any less secure, in fact, it would probably make it more secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.foogazi.com/2006/11/02/linux-software-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inguin.com/wordpress/?p=33#comment-119</guid>
		<description>That is an agreement beneficial to Novell and to MS, not necessarily to Linux.

1) Because MS is locking Novell patents (and it already did something similar with Sun), so other Linux companies cannot get any help in eventual litigations... Dividi et impera...

2) Because the porting effort is not bilateral. You have OS-A which has its own applications plus the ones of OS-B, and OS-B that has its own application but none of OS-A. Which one do you want to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an agreement beneficial to Novell and to MS, not necessarily to Linux.</p>
<p>1) Because MS is locking Novell patents (and it already did something similar with Sun), so other Linux companies cannot get any help in eventual litigations&#8230; Dividi et impera&#8230;</p>
<p>2) Because the porting effort is not bilateral. You have OS-A which has its own applications plus the ones of OS-B, and OS-B that has its own application but none of OS-A. Which one do you want to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
